<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>mccv - Latest Comments in Running Scala specs tests in Maven with JUnit 4</title><link>http://mccv.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mccv.disqus.com/running_scala_specs_tests_in_maven_with_junit_4/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:01:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Running Scala specs tests in Maven with JUnit 4</title><link>http://www.themcwongs.com/?p=66#comment-13399737</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent, that would be quite a bit nicer.  Having the object/class pair is a bit clunky... Overall the framework is very nice though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mccv</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:01:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Running Scala specs tests in Maven with JUnit 4</title><link>http://www.themcwongs.com/?p=66#comment-13366874</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Mark,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 tips for making your specification even more concise (with specs.1.6.0-SNAPSHOT or 1.5.1 SNAPSHOT):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This will make your specification class a JUnit test:&lt;br&gt;class BasicCassandra extends SpecificationWithJUnit { ... }&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is still runnable in the console with:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;scala -cp &amp;lt;...&amp;gt; run BasicCassandra&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And you can write (if you like it):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;cass.connect().before&lt;br&gt;cass.close().after&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Eric.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">etorreborre</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:05:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>